I'm not sure who I've heard say this on talk radio, perhaps it's a number of hosts. I'm pretty sure Rush and Levin have both said that this election is not about McCain, but is a referendum on Obama. Surely the journalist who wrote this article picked up on this. Well, I do agree that this election is all about Obama. Obama is hailed as the messiah for the Democrats, but he isn't even cracking 50% in the polls. Perhaps Americans aren't as blind as the Mainstream Media thinks they are. On the outside, it would appear to be a two man race, but really it is just a "Referendum on Obama". Are Obama and his radical policies what America needs (no) or even want? (I hope not)
Even though McCain is the one who picked up the nomination for the Republicans, he was not the choice of conservatives or even of a majority of Republicans. However with no clear-cut conservative candidate, McCain emerged as the guy the largest segment of Republicans (and Democrats who decided to vote in the Republican Primary) chose to vote for. Conservatives were split trying to figure out who, between Romney, Thompson, Giuliani and Huckabee, fit the mold they were looking for. None of them were the star that conservatives hoped for, and McCain emerged as the winner almost by default. It was almost like a 'Battle Royale' and McCain hid in the corner as all the other guys were fighting it out. Once Romney had his back turned, McCain snuck up and pushed him out of the ring.
Coming back to Obama, as he is what this election is about anyway. He is not running away with this election, and the Democrats are stunned. He has received Rock Star treatment and has women swooning over him. Why isn't he running away with this election then? I believe that the more people find out about his policies, the more he scares the crap out of them. His policies sound a whole lot like a watered down version of Marxism. He is so set on raising taxes on the rich to make things "fair" he misses the point. The rich already pay WAY more than what is "fair", but Obama wants to increase it. If Obama wanted the tax structure to be "fair", he would be pushing for the Fair Tax, or some sort of flat tax. No, he wants wealth redistribution. The problem is, wealth redistribution ALWAYS FAILS. If we redistribute wealth, we will lose jobs. Big Business will be forced to move overseas, and small businesses will go out of business. The businesses that stay and survive will not be able to hire as many employees because their tax burden is too high. People will have to work more hours to make ends meet, (if they can find a job) cutting time with family which already is too low in America.
His energy policies are laughable. He (and his party) has done nothing to attempt to bring down oil prices. He says we just need to use less. Well here's the problem Barack, we ARE using less. But at $4.00 a gallon it crushes our wallet no matter how much we cut back. If we all lived in Chicago or New York, it wouldn't matter quite as much, but where regular Americans live, we sometimes have to drive to places like work. Increased fuel and food prices mean we have to cut back on spending, (which hurts the economy) saving and investing, (which hurts our future as well as the economy) or paying bills, which hurts quality of life. The average joe has had to cut back to make ends meet and Obama has offered nothing but this little nugget of wisdom; "put air in your tires". Brilliant, if that is the kind of leadership we can expect for four years of an Obama administration, there's no wonder he isn't cleaning McCain's clock.
I really hate the idea of voting against someone I don't like. I really would like to vote FOR someone I do like. But in order to do that, I'll have to write someone in. I just 'hope' Americans will come to their senses and pay attention to the 'change' that Obama wants to bring to America. It looks a whole lot like Marxism.
23 comments:
What's that swishin sound you hear?
Oh, that's the sound of the Mets gettin swept by the 'Stros :)
I thought they had turned the tide, but they've played like garbage. I think they've dropped 5 of 6 to the Reds and 'Stros. Embarrassing.
Your Mets are still way in it. "Stros unlikely, BUT they've done it before when least expected.
Actually, it's been said by a left-wing host as well. Rachael Maddow (AAR/MSNBC) says that if it's allowed that the subject becomes Obama instead of Bush(/McCain't), then McCain't wins.
Stan,
I disagree, McLame needs to make the debate about issues to have a chance. Your point i valid tho.
You keep makin sense and I might re-list you on my blog rolls.
Why is that Stan? If his plans are so good, and he's getting all the press he should win. Unless his plans are bad. If people start finding out about his Marxist roots, they're not going to like it very much. Well 25% of Americans won't care, but he could get pounded if people start to realize what he's really all about.
Ok Reck, I've deleted you from my blogroll. When you include me in your blogroll, I'll readd you to my blogroll.
Nestor, "straw man". If anything is "marxist", it's the Republican't party.
So Stan,
Which party wants less freedom, more regulation, higher taxes, wealth redistribution, socialized medicine, socialized energy, socialized fill-in-the blank, open borders, etc, etc? The Democrats are heading towards Marxism Stan, and you can say 'straw man' until you turn blue, but it doesn't make my points any less true.
Stan,
I'm touched.
Nestor -
> Which party wants less freedom ... higher taxes (StanNote: for the poor and middle class), wealth redistribution ...
The (communist) Republican'ts (which is the most right-wing of 'em (about 98% of them.))
Stan,
The majority of Republicans want lower taxes for EVERYBODY. Obama wants to RAISE taxes on EVERYBODY. That's not what he's saying, but allowing tax cuts to expire (which he wants) is a tax increase. Raising taxes on the rich means less jobs for the poor. You can't be so thick you don't understand that. (I'm assuming that you're a pretty smart guy) So you must want socialism more than you want a bustling economy.
"I'm assuming that you're (Stan) a pretty smart guy"
You assume wrong.
Nestor -
> ... The majority of Republicans want lower taxes for EVERYBODY.
What about the Republican'ts (which are ruling the Republicans)?
> Obama wants to RAISE taxes on EVERYBODY.
Garbage (I would use the BS word here, but it's Nestor's blog and I respect his wishes on refraining from cussing here.)
Stan,
I know you are going on vacation and I probably won't get a response, but are you telling me that Obama wants to either lower taxes or keep them the same? He is for raising the Death tax, Capital Gains, which are for the poor AND rich, and income tax on the 'rich'. The thing about the 'rich' is many small business owners fall in this category, so when you raise taxes on small business, you are telling small business that they can't hire as many employees. The people that would be hired by small business owners are the poor and middle class. So I say Obama is anti-poor and anti-middle class.
If it hadn't been for cotton-eye joe
I'd been married long time ago
Where did you come from. Where did you go?
Where did you come from cotton-eye joe?
If it hadn't been for cotton-eye joe
I'd been married long time ago
Where did you come from. Where did you go?
Where did you come from cotton-eye joe?
If it hadn't been for cotton-eye joe
I'd been married long time ago
Where did you come from. Where did you go?
Where did you come from cotton-eye joe?
If it hadn't been for cotton-eye joe
I'd been married long time ago
Where did you come from. Where did you go?
Where did you come from cotton-eye joe?
If it hadn't been for cotton-eye joe
I'd been married long time ago
Where did you come from. Where did you go?
Where did you come from cotton-eye joe?
If it hadn't been for cotton-eye joe
I'd been married long time ago
Where did you come from. Where did you go?
Where did you come from cotton-eye joe?
He brought disaster wherever he went
The hearts of the girls was to hell broken sent
They all ran away so nobody would know
And left only men cause of cotton-eye joe
If it hadn't been for cotton-eye joe
I'd been married long time ago
Where did you come from. Where did you go?
Where did you come from cotton-eye joe?
If it hadn't been for cotton-eye joe
I'd been married long time ago
Where did you come from. Where did you go?
Where did you come from cotton-eye joe?
(solo)
He brought disaster wherever he went
The hearts of the girls was to hell broken sent
They all ran away so nobody would know
And left only men cause of cotton-eye joe
(solo)
If it hadn't been for cotton-eye joe
I'd been married long time ago
Where did you come from. Where did you go?
Where did you come from cotton-eye joe?
If it hadn't been for cotton-eye joe
I'd been married long time ago
Where did you come from. Where did you go?
Where did you come from cotton-eye joe?
(solo)
If it hadn't been for cotton-eye joe
I'd been married long time ago
Where did you come from. Where did you go?
Where did you come from cotton-eye joe?
If it hadn't been for cotton-eye joe
I'd been married long time ago
Where did you come from. Where did you go?
Where did you come from cotton-eye joe?
(solo)
If it hadn't been for cotton-eye joe
I'd been married long time ago
Where did you come from. Where did you go?
Where did you come from cotton-eye joe?
Reck -
> McLame needs to make the debate about issues to have a chance.
What planet do you live in?
Oh... I live on the planet where a presidential candidate (who's wife is diagnosed w/ cancer; which he uses to help further his agenda)gives speech after speech about bein a moral leader; all the while he's beddin some bimbo, payin her for her hard "work" w/ campaign funds, fatherin her child, lieing about it, gettin his wife and friends to lie about it and gettin $800 dollar haircuts.
I call it Stanworld.
Stan Rosenthal said August 12:
Nestor -
> The thing about the 'rich' is many small business owners fall in this category
********
I'd just add..
The (supposed) American Civil Liberties Union
The (supposed) Democrat Party
The (supposed) Main Stream Media
The (supposed) public airwaves
And the (supposed) Stanley Rosenthal
So let me get the jist of your argument, Nestor and Recknhavic. Ya'll don't believe that I exist.
Do I have that assumption correct? Can we at least stipulate that I exist???? ;-)
Nestor -
> Comment deleted
Because I said the BS word. :-) Notice that I posted censored lyrics to the Cotten Eyed Joe in the next comment. :-)
Nestor -
>>Stan Rosenthal said August 12:
>Nestor -
> The thing about the 'rich' is many small business owners fall in this category
> ********
What Nestor *STARRED* out there, was my BS word that Nestor decided to erase(/some might say censor) above in my original comment. Y Nestor decided to bring this back up even after he *MODERATED* my comment because I used one of those 7 words ... ( and I respect Nestor's right to do this on his blog ) is beyond me ( ;-) ), but I'll accept Nestor's comment as it is.
Post a Comment