I originally wanted to do one post on Republianism, but I see one more is necessary. Amnesty. Conservatives burn at the thought of giving the 20 million or more illegal immigrants amnesty for breaking our laws and coming here illegally. But a Republican president and Republican congress did nothing about fixing the problem. Now, with the do-nothing Democratic congress it surely will not get fixed. Question: Why aren't Republicans siding with their conservative base on this issue? Answer: Because Big Business wants cheap labor.
Cheap labor is so desireable for Big Business that they will sacrifice our security for it, and Republicanism lets it go. What happens? You have millions of people being abused, overworked and underpaid. But you, the average American, get your products a little cheaper. But you also get porous borders and a devastating strain on our social programs. Add to that the millions of people who have applied to come here legally who can actually add real benefit to our society who are left in the cold.
If I was someone in Mexico or Guatemala or whereever I lived that could somehow sneak into America and provide a better life for my family, I would probably do it too. After all, there is very little deterrence. In fact, big business and the Republican Party has invited you in. The Democrats have invited you in too, (because they want your vote) but the Republicans are the ones who claim to protect America. So you come here illegally, you lay brick for $8 an hour, putting every other bricklayer out, because it is just too low a wage for an American to compete with. Or maybe you wash dishes for $3-4 an hour. Either way, it's more than you would make in your own country, but it hurts America.
Since business wants this continual flow of cheap labor, they leave our borders open. But open borders comes with another consequence besides putting Americans out of work. If poor Mexicans can cross the border, how about well-funded terrorists? How about gang members and drug dealers? We know that 90-95% of the people coming here illegally just want to try to make a better life for their families, but what about the rest? When you are dealing with millions of people, 5-10% is a large number of people who are up to no good. We are producing enough criminals out of our own population, we don't need to import anymore thank you. Truly it is just a matter of time before a major terrorist attack is carried out in America due to our open border.
So what should we do? Build a real border fence from San Diego to Brownsville, and then one across the entire northern border. Cut off all benefits for those here illegally with the lone exception being TRUE emergency healthcare. That means no school for children here illegally, no welfare, nothing. Slam employers who hire illegal immigrants. If there are no jobs and no benefits, the ones here with the intent of bettering the lives of their family will leave. They will self-deport. It will be possible to eventually deport most of the ones who remain as we catch them for speeding, DWI, drug crimes etc. Then we make it easier and faster to come here LEGALLY, while still ensuring that those coming here legally do not have criminal records, and are not carrying disease. We should not let people come here illegally and spit in the face of everyone who did it 'the right way,' just so big business can keep the profits soaring and the Republicans (and Democrats too) can keep getting their campaign contributions.
30 comments:
Good post. The repubs have always had this sellout relationship w/ big busines. The dims as well (altho to a lesser extent).
The problem w/ amnesty (besides it being unfair to those who've come here legally) is that if you give all the illegals amnesty there will be 20 million more who will come in right behind em. Would be poetic justice tho, give em citizenship and then have other illegals undercut em and steal their jobs.
That's why we can't give amnesty and we have to build a fence, and then make it undesirable for illegals to come here.
BTW, I heard this quote today. It was Bush speaking on McCain, and he said something like; "he's a solid conservative". What does George Bush know about conservatism? That would be like me being a soccer ref. I've seen the game played but I don't know any of the rules. You can't fight right? OK, if you don't fight, its a good soccer game.
I'm still waiting 4 your post(s) "straw man"ing Democrats for what's supposedly wrong with America. So-far, you're *RIGHT-ON*, it's Republican'ts that are the problem
Stan,
Republicans have issues. Democrats have more issues and they are far more dangerous to America. But I felt like I should start with Republicans. I feel pretty good with the two posts. I think I've hit the real problems with Republicanism. Now it could be my lifes work to write what's wrong with the Democrats and liberalism.
Lol! Yep, there's no fightin in soccer. They do hug tho (in a totally gay way), which is probably why I don't watch it.
I think you could possibly write what's wrong w/ the dims in, lets say, thirty-five posts or less.
35 posts, I may as well write a book. I could call it 'illiberalism'.
I don't watch soccer cuz it's bloody boring.
Sounds like you've got yourself a project, Nestor!
Nestor -
> Democrats have more issues and they are far more dangerous to America.
Certainly the Democratic Senators that voted for the bill today are that dangerous to America. But it was *EVERY* *ONE* of the Republican't Senators that voted for that unConstitutional bill.
BTW: If it's unConstitutional, it's dangerous to America.
What bill?
FISA. The Senate yesterday voted to give the telecom corps retroactive immunity for the crimes (spying on American citizens and people) they've committed in the past.
Spying on Americans? Not sure about that, but I actually don't have a problem with the government listening to my phone calls since I'm not a terrorist. If they listen to my calls they would probably be bored. If I'm making strange phone calls to the middle east, then I'm glad they are listening because they are doing their job of trying to protect America. The bottom line is, if you have nothing to hide, why are you worried?
Yeah Stan...what are you so paranoid about ;)
Nestor -
> ... I actually don't have a problem with the government listening to my phone calls ...
Well *I* have a problem with the government listening to your phone calls. Call me paranoid 4U.
Reck, :-)
> ... I actually don't have a problem with the government listening to my phone calls ...
So Nestor, do you have any problem with corporations listening to your phone calls? Or are you tacitly admitting that there's no separation of Corp. and State?
There is a separation of corporation and state...right now. There won't be if we have Hillary or Barack and a Democratic Congress.
Nestor, do you pay attention to politics @ all? You seem to not be aware of current events.
I am aware of how the democrats want to socialize big business. A democrat president along with a democrat congress will do just that.
Straw man. Attack the real Dems, you're missing your target as-per-usual.
Nestor -
> Presidential Hopefuls (and their chance of me voting for them at this moment)
Gov. Mike Huckabee (R) AR 99%
Sen. Hillary Clinton (D) NY 1%
Sen. John McCain (D) AZ. 0%
Sen. Barack Obama (D) IL 0%
Dude, you do know that Mike Gravel is still in the race, don't you? ;-)
Did you ever check out goldwatermiller08.com?
BTW Nestor, I hate to inform you of this (it might burst your little bubble you live in), but Senator McCain is a Republican't.
(almost) Every piece of legislation with his name on it has been a liberal one, that makes him a Democrat in my book.
The only thing McPain would do better than Hillbama is stay the course in Iraq. However, it's a mute point because the guy is not gonna win.
The one hope is that, if we as a nation can survive Jimmy Carter, we can survive Hillbama.
I hate to burst your bubble, Nestor, but the Democratic party is a moderate party.
The democrat party is a moderate party???? I don't think those are plain brownies that you are eating Stan. You might want to be careful.
Stan, the Republican party is only moderate because of the 20-30% that is conservative. There is a 20-30% in the GOP that is moderate and the rest are liberals too. The democrat party of Kennedy (John F. Kennedy) was moderate. JFK (Kennedy not Kerry) would be conservative by today's standards. He would probably be called an evil conservative hate-monger.
A member of the RWLTPC ("Right-Wing Lying-Type Propaganda Campaign" (tm) ) writes -
> The democrat party ...
> ... the Republican party is only moderate ...
> Sen. John McCain (D)...
Weird Al writes about right-wing extremist lying-type propaganda artists sometimes and IMHO.
For instance, Nestor says -
> JFK ... would be conservative by today's standards.
"And he runs by screaming "Everything you know is wrong, *BLACK IS WHITE UP IS DOWN and SHORT IS LONG*"" - "Genius Al" Yankovic
Stan,
This is what you pinged me for? To tell me black is white for the 100th time?
Stan,
Curious what you think about JFK? One a my fav prez's BTW.
test beat me to it. I was gonna say test. Now I can't. Thanks test.
Reck, I think more of what would've been if he wasn't assassinated.
Post a Comment