I have realized there are a number of problems with America, and the problems are not minor. We are showing the sort of wear-and-tear that the Roman Empire showed. There are serious cracks in the armor of this mighty nation. I will have at least two more posts which go into other facets of what's wrong, but I will start with the Republican Party and Republicanism. For those who do not know me politically, I am an independent conservative so what I am about to say is not the ravings of a liberal loon. I have given much thought to this subject. Anyway, that's enough introduction.
Republicanism. To the left, it is a word that means right-wing extremism, overzealous Christians and Big Business without regulation. This business of Big Business is what I really want to address. Republicanism (not to be confused with conservatism) wants business to be able to do whatever is necessary in order to bring profits. I voted against Texas Proposition 15 ($3 billion for cancer research) because I know that the money won't cure cancer. The problem is that the drug companies and research firms don't want to cure cancer. Why would they when they keep getting money for research? If they find a cure, they'll be out of business, the money will stop rolling in.
The bottom line is this: there is a cure for cancer, it is the human body. The human body fights cancer all the time. But over the last 50 years (especially the last 20) the increase in chemicals in everything has skyrocketed. Our bodies are spending so much time trying to get rid of the toxins we keep poisoning ourselves with that they can't fight off things that they normally would. We have also handicapped our bodies with medication. Taking medication for everything has made our bodies weak in that they don't have to fight anything, as the toxins are getting stronger and stronger. We need more and more medicine. Sure people are living longer, right now. But we're entering an era where many of us will live longer than our children, becuase they are starting out with their systems being bombarded.
What about the food we eat? The most important thing our bodies need to fight toxins has been relegated to what is most convenient. I won't discuss the lack of the family meal in our current society here, but that is a problem as well. But we eat what is easy, what is quick regardless of what is in it. I have taken a lot of Chemistry courses, but I still do not know many of the ingredients in the average person's food. Here's an idea: eat more food with one ingredient. For example, I like to eat this yellow thing that has one ingredient. It's one ingredient is; banana. How about the yellowy-orange things whose one ingredient is orange? Those are pretty good. You see, we were not designed to eat massive amounts of chemicals designed to taste like something. Most packaged food is so stripped of nutrients that flavor chemicals (chemicals that make the substance you are ingesting taste like food) have to be added. Why is this the case? In order to take our kids to piano, ballet, soccer, boy scouts, girl scouts, karate and swimming lessons, we eat on the go. The problem with the one ingredient foods are that they usually go bad in a week. So you strip all of the nutrition out and it lasts forever...literally. But now it doesn't taste so good, so you add the neurotoxin monosodium glutamate (aka glutamic acid, glutamate, natural flavor, artificial flavor etc) which stimulates your brain to give you a 'high' and add flavor to make it taste like something. But you get zero nutrition.
What does business get besides a pass from Washington? Big profits. All these people who are getting no nutrition will need medicine later in life because their bodies will inevitably break down. The cost of processing all of this 'food' is relatively cheap because most of it is done in a chemistry lab somewhere in large quantities. (probably in New Jersey) Then drug companies get billions of dollars for research and the sale of medicine to treat all of these problems that should not occur in the first place. Look at the obesity epidemic in America. How about childhood diabetes? These did not exist 30-40 years ago. At the very least they were the exception. But now it's a 'genetic' problem. "Hey Fred, you've put on a lot of weight. Yeah Sam, it runs in my family." Really? Roughly 10% of America was fat 25 years ago now its 30%. But sure, it must be 'bad genes.'
Americans have taken the easy road, and Big Business along with Republicanism has helped them all the way to the bank, wholly unchecked by the government who is supposed to look out for us. Instead, Congress is worried about raising money for their re-election campaign. They are not doing their job of protecting America, but instead are looking out for their own bottom line. They are trying to figure out how when they get out of office, they can know the loopholes in the system well enough to make $20 million consulting Big Business on how to best rip off the American people legally. This problem is not just Republicans, but they are the bigger offender in this area. It is why the health of this nation is deteriorating, why our borders are wide open and many other reasons. More to come...
22 comments:
Nestor, are you ok? That was a pretty good analysis. Sure there were errors (like you like to think you know what the left's posistion is on Republicanism (I say, there are Republicans and Republican'ts. The 'can'ts are currently in control of the GOP and the right-wing hate-talk machine (except perhaps in your case?) It appears that the GOP and the right-wing hate-talk machine has lost it's control on Republicans (evidence: McCAindeint's big win on Super Tuesday), and that's a good thing.
Good post, Nestor! I'm currently eating a yellow thing with one ingredient in your honor.
Aw crap, I forgot these things make my throat itch. Maybe some Doritos will help. Ha, ok I'm kidding about the Doritos.
Stan,
You may not be so happy when you see what I have to say about liberalism. I think I need at least one more post on Republicanism, maybe one for moderates, and probably 3-4 for liberalism. I planned to make this 3 parts, but this one got so long I had to stop it. To be continued...
You could've said the same thing in a much shorter post IMHO. Like you could've written about only what you thought the problem with Republican'tism without adding in what you think the left thinks about Republican'tism.
> You may not be so happy when you see what I have to say about liberalism.
I've heard all the right-wing lies before. Don't worry about it. But how about at least come up with new lies? ;-)
Good analysis. Curious why you're studying to be a pharmacist? Maybe a pharmacist vigilanty ;)
Would disagree tho that it's goverments job to take care of us, would rather they'd just leave us alone. Build roads and arm soldiers would be enough, thank you very much.
Listened to the first part a Romney's address to CPAC on drive home last night and I have to say, liked it very much.
Leaning toward Obama now...I know..but what the heck.
I agree that the government's job is not to be our mommy, but they do have a responsibility to make sure that we are protected. They regulate the wrong things. Like trying to pastuerize everything. I'll take my chances with unpastuerized almonds thank you. But, they protect big business by protecting their right to put garbage in our 'food' as 'trade secrets'. The secret is that it's a chemical concoction that has no nutrition, but since they have contributed to the local congressman and senators re-election campaign, they get a pass.
About why I want to be a pharmacist. I want to help people.
Regarding food...I get caught up in the 'which is better for you?' thing. Take butter. At first they were pushin margarine, then they said THAT'LL kill ya quicker than butter. Go back to butter.
But how bout that "I Can't Believe It's Not Butter" spray? I love that stuff! No calories, no fat, no sodium, no cholesterol. Who knows what the hel it is, but did you hear what it's NOT? It can't be THAT bad for you....
can it?
I can't believe it's trans fat! We don't really use any kind of fakey butter anymore. Over time we've gone to just using good oils like olive oil. But as far as I can tell, Smart Balance is a good spread. The key is to look in the ingredients and avoid anything that is hydrogenated or partially hydrogenated. Companies are not required to list trans fat if it is less than 0.5 grams per serving. What they do is make the servings really small so they can say: "0 grams trans fat per serving." Even though it has more calories, you are better off using real butter instead of any spread based on trans fat (anything that is hydrogenated or partially hydrogenated) in the long run.
Yeah, don't care for Smart Balance, unfortunately. From I understand the hydrogenation is so they can get it to the consistency they want. Turning it to a solid. That's why I like the spray. I'm an olive oil fan, too. (I'm Italian for goodness sake.) But I can't make a grilled cheese with oil!;) Butter makes me feel indulgent. It's a mental thing.
What hydrogenation essentially is, is turning an oil into a solid. The reason why oils like olive oil are liquid at room temperature is because they are not saturated with hydrogen. If all of the carbon atoms in a fat have the full amount of possible hydrogens it makes the fat straight. It can be stacked and solid at room temperature. If a fat doesn't have the full amount of hydrogen for each carbon atom, it forces the carbon atoms to form double bonds with each other, making the shape bent. If it is bent it is harder to solidify.
What trans fats are is a 'good oil' like olive oil bombarded with hydrogen. It turns an oil into a solid by breaking the carbon to carbon double bonds, again making the fat 'straight'.
I tried to make this not so technical, but maybe I did, sorry. But like I said, if you hate SmartBalance, I'd go with butter. Anyway, I hope that helps.
Nestor -
> I agree that the government's job is not to be our mommy, ...
So you believe abortion should be legal. ;-)
No Stan,
Abortion should be a crime. It is after all the taking of an of an innocent life. It's murder. First degree murder. This is what pro-choice should mean. You have the choice to use protection or abstain altogether, or live with the consequences of your actions. If you do not want to raise the child yourself, there are many people who want to adopt children.
So go for an amendment that would make it against the law.
You might say that it's killing living tissue, but to say it's taking a life is a fallicious statement (or you could call it a lie.) It's the equivilent of killing a cockroach, IMHO.
I take part of that last part back. It's the equivilent of killing a chicken egg.
Why does it need to be an amendment? Should the US every law in the constitution like Texas? Roe vs. Wade was an abuse of judicial power and used an EXTREMELY loose interpretation of the constitution. It just needs to overturned.
Read the Constitution. It hands out rights to "people" and "citizens", not to any "fetus". If you want it to be a crime to kill clusters of cells, you need to amend the Constitution so those potential laws will be Constitutional. And if you don't do that: you hate America.
What makes a person a person? It is Gods will. God's blueprint is DNA. Surely you will say that it is not God, but can't you deny that DNA is the blueprint for any type of life. The five foot long piece of DNA that is the blueprint for every human is in EVERY cell in the body. So at the moment of conception, the blueprint is there. The one-celled embryo is a human as long as we don't get in the way and destroy it. (Or if God doesn't) The power to give life rests with God. The power to take it should also rest with God.
Nestor hates America, so it appears. Nestor couldn't care less about the Constitution of the United States of America, so it appears.
Nestor -
> ... God ...
What (supposed) God? I'm all ears.
About God, open your eyes Stanley. He has made Himself obvious to those willing to see Him.
A baby is a person, Nestor. And when I see the (supposed) God in you, all I see is a lying-type propaganda artist. And not a very good one at that.
Post a Comment